Author: WadeEmmert

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Cyber Attacks on Health Care Up 136% Last Year

Summary of article from Medical Economics, by Grace Koennecke:

In 2023, the US experienced a significant rise in data breaches, with 3,205 incidents reported, marking a 78% increase from 2022. The healthcare industry saw a 136% increase in data breaches, affecting 56 million individuals, while the financial services sector experienced a 177% rise, impacting 61 million people. The Identify Theft Resource Center recommends the healthcare sector adopt stronger breach notice laws and improve vendor due diligence to mitigate cyber threats.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

“Wheels Fall Off” FTC’s Latest Hospital Merger Challenge

Summary of article from Holland & Knight LLP, by Bill Katz, David Kully, Krithika Rajkumar:

The Judge in FTC v. Community Health Systems Inc. & Novant Health Inc., denied the FTC’s motion to block Novant Health’s $320 million acquisition of two hospitals, marking a rare loss for the FTC in hospital merger challenges. The ruling revitalized the “failing firm” defense, suggesting that the assets in question would cease to be competitive without the merger, despite not meeting the stringent criteria outlined in the Merger Guidelines. The court acknowledged potential harm to competition but emphasized that the acquisition would likely enhance investment and competition in the Charlotte area. The FTC has appealed the decision, with the application of the failing firm defense expected to be a key issue. This case may influence future hospital mergers involving financially distressed entities.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

For All Intents and Purposes the Ninth Circuit Shakes Up Antitrust Law With Sidibe v. Sutter Decision

Summary of article from Proskauer Rose LLP, by David Munkittrick, Evelyn Blanco:

The Ninth Circuit Court’s decision in Sidibe v. Sutter Health may significantly alter the approach to rule of reason antitrust cases by emphasizing the importance of historical evidence and the intent behind challenged conduct. The court reversed the District Court’s ruling due to the exclusion of pre-2006 evidence and errors in jury instructions, which failed to consider Sutter Health’s purpose. The majority opinion argued that understanding the intent is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of antitrust claims, while the dissent warned against overcomplicating trials with extensive historical context. This ruling suggests a potential shift towards incorporating intent more prominently in antitrust analyses, raising questions about trial complexity and jury management. Legal professionals will need to adapt to these changes to effectively advocate in antitrust cases.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Diabetes Care

Summary of article from DiaTribe, by Michael Howerton:

Experts at the ADA 2024 Scientific Sessions highlighted AI’s potential to revolutionize clinical practice through applications like automated insulin delivery and AI-augmented clinical trials. While the benefits are substantial, concerns about data security and privacy must be addressed to ensure wider adoption. AI’s integration into diabetes care promises to empower patients with more control and knowledge about their condition. The continued development of AI-driven systems and safeguards will be crucial in realizing these advancements.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Healthcare Chatbots: When Do They Help and When Do They Hurt?

Summary of article from Built In, by Alexandra Whitt:

Healthcare chatbots offer significant benefits, including improved user engagement, quick responsiveness to minor health queries, reduced administrative workload, enhanced customer satisfaction, and better advocacy for health and wellness programs. They streamline processes such as appointment scheduling and insurance claims, providing 24/7 access to critical information. However, chatbots face limitations like lacking empathy, potential for incomplete assessments, data security risks, and the overwhelming variety of options available. While they enhance efficiency and accessibility in healthcare, it is crucial to recognize their limitations and ensure they complement rather than replace professional medical advice.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Three Key Areas Where Healthcare IT Leaders Can Deploy AI to Improve Patient Outcomes

Summary of article from CIO, by John Cox:

Healthcare IT leaders can deploy AI to improve patient outcomes in three key areas: fully utilizing patient-related data, personalizing the patient experience, and easing administrative burdens on healthcare professionals. By consolidating patient data with tools like Microsoft Azure, AI can create a standardized data source, enhancing data analytics and compliance. Personalization can be achieved by leveraging AI to integrate disparate data, improving patient interactions and care processes. Additionally, AI can automate routine administrative tasks, allowing healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care. Partnering with experienced IT solutions providers can expedite these AI implementations and support future advancements.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Modernizing and Securing Hospital Technology Infrastructure

Summary of article from MedCity News, by Derek Grant:

The healthcare industry is undergoing a significant digital transformation, necessitating the modernization of technology infrastructure to improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency. Budget constraints and the complexity of integrating diverse systems across merged hospital networks pose significant challenges. Prioritizing security is critical, with a comprehensive strategy encompassing Zero Trust, data protection, and compliance frameworks to mitigate cyber threats. Effective data governance and the adoption of AI-based solutions can enhance decision-making, operational efficiency, and security. Ongoing cybersecurity training and a culture of vigilance are essential to protect sensitive medical data and maintain patient trust.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

How Generative AI Is Shaping Drug Discovery

Summary of article from Healthcare Brew, by Mikaela Cohen:

Generative AI is revolutionizing drug discovery by significantly reducing the time and cost involved in developing new medicines, a process traditionally taking around a decade and $2.7 billion. Researchers are leveraging AI to identify new drug targets, design molecular structures, and expedite clinical trials, with AI-generated drugs moving from concept to first dose in as little as 1.5 years. However, ensuring high-quality, unbiased data is critical to the success of these AI systems. AI also holds promise in addressing patient recruitment challenges in clinical trials by simulating human genetic makeup and drug interactions. Despite these advancements, regulatory hurdles remain a significant challenge, with the need for health authorities to ensure AI’s efficacy and safety in drug development.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Texas Judge Upholds Hospitals’ Right to Use Online Tracking Technology

Summary of article from The Record, by Suzanne Smalley:

A Texas federal judge ruled that the Biden administration’s policy to limit hospitals’ use of online tracking technology overstepped its authority. The policy, issued by the HHS in 2022, aimed to protect user privacy by warning that third-party data collection could violate HIPAA. Despite the HHS’s recent revision and warnings about the risks of technologies like Meta/Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics, the judge found that the guidance improperly extended HIPAA’s reach to data from public website searches. This decision followed a lawsuit from the American Hospital Association and other plaintiffs. The ruling underscores the complexity and extensive reach of federal regulations in modern life.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

PHI Compromised in Cyberattacks on South Texas Oncology and Hematology & Highland Health Systems

Summary of article from The HIPAA Journal, by Steve Adler:

South Texas Oncology and Hematology (STOH) in San Antonio, TX, and Highland Health Systems in Anniston, AL, have experienced significant cyberattacks, compromising the personal and protected health information of their patients and employees. STOH’s breach, detected in February 2024, affected 176,303 individuals, exposing names and medical information, while Highland Health Systems’ breach, detected in July 2023, impacted 83,543 individuals, revealing sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and medical information. Both organizations have engaged third-party cybersecurity firms, notified law enforcement, and provided affected individuals with credit monitoring services. STOH and Highland Health Systems have also enhanced their security measures, including updating security tools and implementing new protections. No evidence of misuse of the compromised data has been found to date.