Categories
Alert

FDA Clarifies Types of Evidence Relevant to Determining the “Intended Use” of FDA-Regulated Products

The FDA proposed updates to clarify the types of evidence it considers when determining the “intended use” of a product. A product’s “intended use” determines whether it is a medical product within the FDA’s jurisdiction. The proposed updates allow any source to be considered, even the subjective knowledge of the manufacturer. The proposed update clarifies, however, that just because a manufacturer has knowledge that health care providers prescribe or use the product for an unapproved use, does not establish a new “intended use” for the product.

Source: FDA Clarifies Types of Evidence Relevant to Determining the “Intended Use” of FDA-Regulated Products

Categories
Alert

FDA Will No Longer Review EUA Requests for COVID-19 Laboratory Developed Tests

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will no longer require premarket review of laboratory developed tests (LDTs), including COVID-19 tests, decline to review emergency use authorization (EUA) request for LDTs. Instead, the FDA will prioritize review of EUAs for point-of-care tests, home collection tests, at-home tests, tests that reduce reliance on test supplies, and high-throughput, widely distributed tests.

Source: FAQs on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDT)

Categories
Alert

Unapproved and Misbranded COVID Treatments Get FDA Attention

There is no FDA-approved treatment for COVID-19, but that hasn’t stopped one compounding pharmacy from making bold claims. Marketing products as “COVID PACK” and “COVID ‘POSITIVE’ PACK” for the “treatment and recovery from the Covid-19 virus” apparently crossed the line. These products appear to be nothing more than vitamins. It wasn’t the products that got the FDA’s attention, but rather the claims of treatment, recovery, and cure. The FDA gave the pharmacy 48 hours to correct the misleading claims.

Source: Warning Letter – Pharmacy Plus, Inc. dba Vital Care Compounder