Category: Health Law Highlights

Categories
Health Law Highlights

FTC Signals Its Intent To Pursue Nonprofit Health Care Entities With Its Non-compete Ban Whenever Possible

Summary of article from Seyfarth Shaw LLP, by Jesse Coleman, Yumna Khan:

The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Final Rule banning non-competes in worker agreements may not exempt nonprofit health care entities, including most hospital systems in the US. The FTC asserts that merely claiming tax-exempt status is not enough to be beyond its jurisdiction; it will also examine whether the corporation is organized for charitable purposes and whether either the corporation or its members derive a profit. The FTC has previously exercised jurisdiction over nonprofit entities engaged in business on behalf of for-profit members. The Final Rule, set to take effect on September 4, 2024, is currently facing legal challenges questioning its constitutionality. In the interim, nonprofit health care entities should consult with legal counsel to determine potential impact from the FTC’s non-compete ban.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Leveraging AI In Healthcare Operations

Summary of article from Forbes, by Brian Fugere:

The application of AI and machine learning in healthcare is transforming not only clinical areas but also operational and workforce management, with the global healthcare AI market projected to reach $427.5 billion by 2032. AI/ML can address pressing challenges in healthcare, such as complex workflows and administrative tasks, which currently consume 60%-80% of healthcare professionals’ time and contribute to workforce shortages. Learning from other industries, healthcare can implement AI/ML to optimize workflows, automate tasks, and improve operational efficiency. However, unique challenges in healthcare, including strict regulations and complex decision-making processes, necessitate careful consideration when adopting these technologies. By strategically and responsibly harnessing AI/ML, healthcare organizations can innovate and improve operations, leading to enhanced patient outcomes and a more efficient healthcare ecosystem.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

How Chief AI Officers Are Guiding Healthcare Companies Into The Future

Summary of article from Forbes, by Andrei Kasyanau:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare, necessitating the role of a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to guide AI strategy and implementation, foster AI innovation, ensure ethical AI use, and build AI talent and partnerships. The CAIO is pivotal in identifying high-value AI opportunities, driving AI adoption, and overseeing the ethical deployment of AI systems. They also play a crucial part in building a strong AI talent pipeline and fostering strategic partnerships. Real-life cases from Mayo Clinic, GE Healthcare, and Elevance Health demonstrate the positive impact of a CAIO in healthcare organizations. The need for a CAIO becomes apparent when organizations face multiple AI initiatives, challenges in scaling AI solutions, concerns about AI ethics, and a need for dedicated AI talent and partnerships.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Four Ways Price Transparency Will Transform Healthcare

Summary of article from D Magazine, by Dr. Eric Bricker:

The lack of healthcare price transparency presents a significant challenge, particularly for insured individuals with high out-of-pocket costs. The federal government has mandated hospitals to disclose prices, but compliance remains low. Some health insurance companies are now linking out-of-pocket costs with healthcare providers’ price and quality, incentivizing patients to opt for high-value care. Price transparency will enable fair treatment of payers, encourage competition among providers, and could potentially reduce healthcare costs. Improved transparency is also expected to enhance the quality of care, countering the current system that often incentivizes lower quality.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Enhancing the Humanity in Health Care With AI

Summary of podcast from Deloitte Insights:

The World Health Organization predicts a shortage of 10 million healthcare workers by 2030, which could result in increased wait times, decreased health outcomes, and worker burnout. AI has the potential to alleviate these issues by automating administrative tasks, thereby freeing up clinicians’ time and making healthcare more human-centric. However, the adoption of AI in healthcare is slowed by apprehensions about the technology and concerns about data privacy. The successful implementation of AI in healthcare requires clinician adoption and leadership, and solutions must be designed to integrate seamlessly into existing workflows. Ultimately, AI has the potential to transform healthcare delivery, improve efficiency, and enhance patient care, but this requires a collaborative approach, robust data governance, and a focus on enhancing rather than replacing human roles.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

Navigating the National Practitioner Data Bank: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals

Summary of article from Ward and Smith, P.A., by Amy G. Fitzhugh, James A. Wilson:

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is a repository of reports on actions taken against healthcare practitioners, providers, and suppliers, aiming to prevent practitioners from moving locations without disclosing adverse events. Entities such as hospitals, health plans, and state licensing boards submit reports to the NPDB, which include Adverse Action Reports, Medical Malpractice Payment Reports, and Judgment or Conviction Reports. The NPDB, analogous to credit reports, contains information that could negatively impact a healthcare professional’s credentialing decision, and like a credit report, it is not publicly accessible but available to authorized users. To manage their NPDB profile, healthcare professionals should occasionally self-query their records, add their own side of the story if something is reported, and dispute inaccuracies with the reporting entity. If the reporting entity denies a correction, the NPDB has a process to dispute a report and, if in agreement, can request the reporting entity to correct or void the report.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

With AI, Keep Patient Satisfaction Top of Mind, Says Health IT Investor

Summary of article from Healthcare IT News, by Bill Siwicki:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize healthcare, with investors viewing it with cautious optimism due to its potential for significant advancements and the need for careful consideration of secondary implications. AI can catalyze the shift towards value-based care by improving patient outcome measurement, personalizing treatments, and predicting health issues for early intervention. AI can also streamline the revenue cycle management process by automating tasks, predicting revenue leakage, and enhancing billing accuracy. While AI won’t replace clinicians, it will assist in decision-making by analyzing complex data points, providing evidence-based recommendations, and identifying potential drug interactions. Despite challenges like data privacy and integration into existing systems, AI’s development trajectory in healthcare is promising.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

A Pair of Texas-Based Schools Are on the Leading Edge of Teaching Doctors About AI

Summary of article from Health Leaders, by Christopher Cheney:

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and University College at the University of Texas at San Antonio are the first institutions to offer an MD/MS dual degree in artificial intelligence, recognizing the growing importance of AI in healthcare. The program, which began planning in 2018 and launched in 2022, offers three pathways: computer science, data analytics, and robotics, with most students choosing data analytics. The MS in AI degree focuses on implementing AI tools such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. This education is expected to improve diagnostic accuracy, personalize treatment plans, streamline operations, and contribute to medical research. The program aims to position physicians in leadership roles in AI technology development, ensuring it is patient-centered and not solely profit-driven.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

US Sues Telehealth Companies Over Data Sharing, Cancelation Policies

Summary of article from mHealth Intelligence, by Anuja Vaidya:

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have filed an amended complaint against telehealth companies, including Cerebral Inc., Zealthy Inc., Gronk Inc., and Bruno Health P.A., alleging misuse of patients’ personal health data, deceptive cancellation practices, and unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data. The complaint also accuses the companies of deploying online tracking technologies for targeted advertisements without user consent. The government alleges that the companies violated the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act), the Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018, and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). While the claims against Cerebral have been settled, with the company agreeing to pay $5 million in consumer redress and a $2 million civil penalty, the government continues to pursue claims against the other companies and individuals involved. Cerebral has also been scrutinized for its controlled substance prescriptions and alleged “unlawful business practices”.

Categories
Health Law Highlights

New Part II Rules

Summary of article from Gordon Feinblatt LLC, by Alexandria K. Monanio:

The Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Patient Records regulations, known as Part II, have been updated to better align with HIPAA privacy protections. Providers have until April 2026 to comply with these changes, which include allowing patients to sign a single consent for all future uses of treatment, payment, and health care operations data. However, identifiable Part II data cannot be disclosed in legal proceedings without explicit patient consent or a court order. The updated rules also provide a safe harbor for investigative agencies and allow patients to file Part II violation complaints directly to the Secretary of HHS. The HHS plans to develop guidance and conduct outreach to facilitate compliance with the new rule, with additional changes to the HIPAA rules expected in the future.